Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGittens, Rolando A.
dc.contributor.authorOlivares-Navarrete, Rene
dc.contributor.authorSchwartz, Zvi
dc.contributor.authorBoyan, Barbara D.
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-08T19:33:07Z
dc.date.available2020-08-08T19:33:07Z
dc.date.issued2014-04-08
dc.identifier.otherdoi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.037
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio-indicasat.org.pa/handle/123456789/232
dc.descriptionThe use of spinal implants for spine fusion has been steadily increasing to avoid the risks of complications and donor site morbidity involved when using autologous bone. A variety of fusion cages are clinically available, with different shapes and chemical compositions. However, detailed information about their surface properties and the effects of such properties on osteogenesis is lacking in the literature. Here we evaluate the role of surface properties for spinal implant applications, covering some of the key biological processes that occur around an implant and focusing on the role of surface properties, specifically the surface structure, on osseointegration, drawing examples from other implantology fields when required. Our findings revealed that surface properties such as microroughness and nanostructures can directly affect early cell behavior and long-term osseointegration. Microroughness has been well established in the literature to have a beneficial effect on osseointegration of implants. In the case of the role of nanostructures, the number of reports is increasing and most studies reveal a positive effect from the nanostructures alone and a synergistic effect when combined with microrough surfaces. Long-term clinical results are nevertheless necessary to establish the full implications of surface nanomodificationsen_US
dc.description.abstractThe use of spinal implants for spine fusion has been steadily increasing to avoid the risks of complications and donor site morbidity involved when using autologous bone. A variety of fusion cages are clinically available, with different shapes and chemical compositions. However, detailed information about their surface properties and the effects of such properties on osteogenesis is lacking in the literature. Here we evaluate the role of surface properties for spinal implant applications, covering some of the key biological processes that occur around an implant and focusing on the role of surface properties, specifically the surface structure, on osseointegration, drawing examples from other implantology fields when required. Our findings revealed that surface properties such as microroughness and nanostructures can directly affect early cell behavior and long-term osseointegration. Microroughness has been well established in the literature to have a beneficial effect on osseointegration of implants. In the case of the role of nanostructures, the number of reports is increasing and most studies reveal a positive effect from the nanostructures alone and a synergistic effect when combined with microrough surfaces. Long-term clinical results are nevertheless necessary to establish the full implications of surface nanomodificationsen_US
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsInfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es
dc.subjectSpine fusion Nanostructuresen_US
dc.subjectTopography roughnessen_US
dc.subjectTitanium surface properties Boneen_US
dc.titleImplant osseointegration and the role of microroughness and nanostructures: Lessons for spine implantsen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.typeInfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedversion


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record